Hydro (peds)
FACTS
Punchline
Can be classified as one of the following:
1. Communicating hydro (non-obstructive)
- NOTE: hydro ex vacuo is to be distinguished from communicating hydro by lack of 3rd V enlargement, effacement of sulci, and periventricular edema on T2/FLAIR) sequences.
2. Non-communicating hydro (obstructive)
CONSULT
HPIChart review: - apneic spells, bradycardia, irregular respirations - OFC increasing at >2cm // week or crossing 97th percentile |
FOCUSED EXAMInfants: fontanelle, sutures upgaze paresis |
IMGCommunicating (non-obstructive): should see dilation of entire ventricular system, patency of foramina of Monroe/aqeuduct, fourth ventricle outlets Non-communicating (obstructive): dilation only proximal to obstruction on MRI: - should see transependymal flow in periventricular WM), cortical sulci. effacement -evaluate forĀ bowing of third ventricule (FIESTA sagittal) -evaluate for aqueductal stenosis
|
A/P[ ] MRI Brain with / without (not a FAST) to fully evaluate ventricular anatomy and rule out pressence of mass lesion. To evaluate cisternal anatomy in detail (which influences treatment options), put one of the following sequences in special requests.
[ ] Optho c/s ot evaluate for visual compromise - Communicating hydro: need VPS - Non-communicating (obstructive) hydro: need VPS vs. ETV +/- CPC (choroid plexus cauterization)
- Counsel: up to 1/3 children will fail shunt in first 3 months, 6% will get infections.
|
Notes
Aqueductal stenosis
Figure 1: Sea